FAFSA, EFC, and Taxes

This blog entry has been moved and updated to the Increa Technology Wiki.

FAFSA stands for Free Application for Federal Student Aid. EFC stands for Expected Family Contribution. They’re terms any parent sending a kid to college knows very well. They’re suppose to help you and your children afford a college education. It’s become a socialized night-mare.

The idea is that you enter all your private financial information in the FAFSA web page, and then using formulas described in the EFC booklet, out pops the number your family is expected to contribute to your kids college. It doesn’t matter how much any college costs, $45,000 per year or $9,000 per year. If it’s more than your EFC, the colleges do a really good job of getting you 1) grants, 2) scholarships, 3) federal loans, or 4) authorized work on campus until what’s remaining for you to pay is equal to your EFC.

I was surprised at how large the EFC number is, so I started playing guessing games with the formula, testing out what would happen if I earned more or less money. I was surprised, and you will be, too!

Consider the marginal change if you earned an extra $100 per year. (If you don’t understand the concept of marginal taxes, you have to read about that first.) Here is the break-out of where the extra $100 goes:

25.00 Federal Taxes
9.30 State Taxes
7.25 Sales Tax
6.20 Social Security
1.45 Medicare
0.80 CA State Disability
——
$50.00 gone to taxes

The EFC marginal “tax rate” is 47% for anybody reporting more than $26,000 annual income. Check Table A6 in the EFC documentation linked above. In the $100 example, this leaves you with $3 for non-college expenses. To re-state it again for clarity, if you earn $100 more, you’ll spend $47 more on college expenses because the colleges will help you $47 less. $50 of it went to taxes. You’ll have $3 left for anything else. Why not earn a lot less and let the government pay for college? I’m done with overtime hours! This is a serious de-motivator to earn more money or get a better job! What are the federal legislators thinking?

I ran the example with 25% Federal tax bracket because that captures the actual Median Household Income in the years 1995 on up to today (bracket is $31K to $74K per year). If you make $74K to $155K per year, the Federal tax jumps to 28% and you get to spend none (zero dollars) of the $100 on non-college electives. If you are in a higher bracket, you loose non-college elective dollars if you earn more!

Some folks have winced when I include sales tax in the calculation. My observation is that nearly everybody spends the money they make each year. During college years, you’ll be lucky to not work in the red (spending more than you make). But if you’re really disciplined and stash all the money in the bank, you can keep the 7.25%. Well sort of. The EFC formula also measures how much you have saved in the bank, taking 5.6% toward college. See Line 23 on Page 9 of the EFC document linked above. If you try to save all of your pay raise, then pay taxes, and pay for college, you’ll be left with 4.65% or less in the bank.

Yippee.

Posted in Finance | Leave a comment

Get Out of My Knickers

I read Jonathon S. Aronie’s commentary in the March 20, 2006 issue of Federal Computer Weekly:

Has anyone noticed that it has become more difficult to be a vendor on the General Services Administration schedule contracts lately? … [A] client recently completed its pre-award attestation review, during which the auditors concluded that the company was making too much money — in other words, its profit was too high — on the services it sells. Although it seems to me that it’s not any of GSA’s business how much profit a company makes as long as its prices are fair and reasonable, the auditors concluded that the prices were unreasonable because our profit was above some unwritten, double-secret threshold.

This reminded me of the sad situation I highlighted in a blog entry back in January. At that time, Steve Kelman wrote that DARPA’s payments to the Grand Challenge winners should be under question because they didn’t audit how much profit the recipient made. It was so far over the top, I still haven’t concluded if his entire article was suppose to be a parody or not.

In light of this recent article, it’s disconcerting that a parody of our government is so indistinguishable from the reality thereof! Does anybody find rational in the government’s invasive mandate of how productive a company can be?!

Posted in Finance, General | Leave a comment

Moral Dilemmas

Being the season of taxes and college applications, four dilemmas have recently been on my mind.

  1. The High School provides an official record saying zero absences. This is required by colleges to compare against the claim on applications. Reality was 5 days of excused absence. So, on the college application, do I write 0 days, or 5 days? Maybe the HS meant un-excused absences? But the admin assistants don’t know — all they know is that this is what the computer spits out. Do I try to get the HS to report a higher number? Do I write a note explaining to the college?
  2. The company provides a W-2 saying $1024. Reality is that they paid $1004. Should the higher number be reported to the IRS to avoid an audit? Reporting the true number appears like unreported income to the IRS.
  3. The web page or other form asks for my mother’s maiden name. I suspect they’re using this for a financial password, just like everybody else (which sort of negates its secret-ness, by the way). I usually make up mother maiden names like a password. The receptionist confirms that this would be okay. The form has a signature block attesting that everything is true. Is signing a lie?
  4. Lastly the FAFSA form asks for state of residency. Researching the EFC actual formulas reveals that this is used to give credit for where you’re living paying state tax. Due to contract jobs and/or military duty, what if I’m paying state taxes where I’m not a resident? How in the world do you complain to nameless FAFSA that the web page entry from says the wrong thing and doesn’t capture the intent of the original formula? In fact, I know government contracting, and highly suspect this was outsourced to a third party, who probably only did management oversight and sub-contracted the actual web page script. This is impenetrable. And, of course, there’s another “sign here and if everything isn’t right, you can go to jail.” Morally, do I answer what the web page asks, or answer what I know the congressional (lawful) intent was?
Posted in General | Leave a comment

Shoot the Round Dial

“Shoot the Round Dial” … as in the one on the wall with 12 numbers and 2 hands.

I was just walking back from an office going-away party and promotion party, combined. A peer opined as she headed into her cube, “2 o’clock, not time to go home yet.” I could tell from the tone of her voice that she didn’t return to her cube to answer the barrage of duties on a warm sunny Friday afternoon. She went back to her cube because the clock said to go back to her cube.

And the realization settled in my consciousness, “What a stupid work cadence we have in civilized, socialized, city living!”

In comparison, what’s a farmer do? Or a hunter? Or a fisherman? They work when there’s work to do. All night, if need be. Farmers even buy high power lights for their tractors. It’s not as if the work is particularly fun. Can you imagine tugging dirt back and forth a huge field well past midnight? Instead, they do it when they do it because it needs to be done then. But when the work is finished, then what? They quit working. (Well, actually they fix all the machinery first, and then the work is done.) If there’s no work to do, go home!

Why does most America work when there’s no work to do? And why do they abandon work just because the little round dial says, “go home”?

Dodging this inane behavior is part of what makes me enjoy private contract work. I am hired to do work because there is work to do. No doubt about it. I like a project mentality. I like finishing the project. And I like finishing something more than another week.

Posted in Contract Work, Spirit & Heart | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Time Domain

People often forget time in their analysis of situations. The classic example is that a dollar today isn’t the same as a dollar tomorrow. Most people have that under their belt.

Today, it was my turn to be reminded that playing time like a control variable is often forgotten. Question: When does a self-employed person have to submit SEP contributions to count for any year?

Table 1 on Page 3 of IRS Pub 560, “Retirement Plans for Small Businesses”, indicates contributions have to be done by the due date of the employers tax return — nominally April 15th of any year. That’s where I quit thinking.

In fact, the time can be extended with an arbitrary number of extensions. This gives an investor time to watch the market for the entire tax year, plus nearly the entire year following up until the final extension date that is available.

Sounds good. Personally, I’m not sure I’d be successful timing the market. But I certainly recognize it as a good freedom. Something I totally overlooked by not thinking in the time domain.

Suggestion:

Whenever you have something figured out, for example “Should the kids drive the car?”, “Should I marry John?”, “How many items should I buy?”, “Should I visit my relatives?”, “How much money do I owe?”, remember the question isn’t fully qualified until the time domain is included.

Posted in General | Leave a comment