Transnational Good and Bad

During the last 10 years, United States National Security has become centered around terrorism. The United States has campaigned a “war on terrorism”.  The interesting thing is there is no specific bad-guy nation with geographic borders called “terrorism”. Because of this, many of the diplomatic, political, military, and economic power plays nations have done on each other in the past don’t work. This situation has been in play for about a decade, and nations are just beginning to understand the implications for National Security.

In February 2011, the US released their first National Security to Secure Cyberspace document (551K pdf). Cyberspace also belies any notion of nation. When Google recently identified many hacking attempts coming from a Chinese city, China has plausible deniability to claim that the attacks were routed through China, but did not come from China, and therefore identifies China as the innocent bystander. Similar to the concept of terrorism, cyberspace has no national boundaries.  When you bomb a nation, everybody can see the damage. When you attack cyberspace, simply doing the BDA (Battle Damage Assessment) is extremely difficult.  There are no dead bodies or crying children to photograph on CNN.

So.. bad stuff is still happening, but is not sourced from nations, or at least is not traceable to nations.  I’ve realized recently that the good-stuff phenomena has the potential to go this direction, too.  People can dislike America, or Russia, or China, or India, or any nation. These are nations who have engaged with the full range of National Power tools.  And now there is a new actor.

Since the early 2000’s, Google has ended up going head-to-head with China on several fronts.  Fun and interesting news.  What happened this week with the hacked gmail accounts made me pay attention because the diplomatic power of Google has reached national proportions.  When Google speaks, and the diplomatic machine of China responds, evoking diplomatic response from the United States, Google has entered a regime of power not seen by any large corporation prior to this time.

I think the special character of Google that allows it to wield such power is the transnational utility. People of a nation need water, food, economy. When deprived of these things, civil and international wars may develop, but often the people without these resources don’t have the power to affect their situation.   Maybe these physical assets will not be the next cause of a big war. Advocates of humane treatment of others abound, but they are not the people themselves; they speak of someone else’s misery. For the people on the end of the Gaussian curve of deprivation, they are politically and economically weak–they simply die when deprived or persecuted enough.

Having no power is not true for the new vocal middle class coming up around the globe. When the Chinese government shutdown Google domestically, what happened? The entire middle class of China, normally an obedient and compliant class, rose up and would not tolerate it. The people with power already have water, food, substance. What they want is their Google.

It’s not Google, per se, but rather a functioning internet that replaces water and food.  Literally, an Internet of the late 1990s existed without search engines. Remember AOL, Prodigy, and early Yahoo attempting to the be competitive info warehouses instead of allowing searches to other people’s pages?  As a participant of the time, I collected web sites and BBS phone numbers that had interesting material.  The concept of going to a search engine and finding new places to visit did not exist.  Now, without a search engine, the Internet is essentially dysfunctional.

So here is my summary:  We’ve had a decade or so of “bad guys” crossing national borders and playing on a global scale.  I mean bad in the sense that the disparate nations want the badness to go away.  Now, we’ve crossed the line where “good guys” also have enough power to play on a global stage.  I mean good in the sense that the disparate nations cannot tolerate the goodness going away. Classical instruments of National Power cannot work against transnational bad guys.  However, now there are good guys with power to affect the nations.

Google has Economic, Diplomatic, Political and Information power they can use to coerce nations.  Nations have Economic, Diplomatic, Political and Military power that isn’t working against terrorists.

 

Posted in General | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Google vs. Government

…from Marcus Asner, former cybersecurity prosecutor… as reported on pg B2 of the Friday, June 3, Wall Street Journal:

It used to be we’d send the FBI agents to find the 16-year old boy in a basement responsible, but now you have national security and State Departmen issues. Now you’re pitting countries against corporations.

Google is large enough to reasonably accuse China.  There is an additional personal interest because my first web page came on line just about a year prior to Google’s, and it’s fun to see how far they’ve gone. China diplomats and government officials respond to Googles assertions as they would have responded to the US Government in prior decades.  The game has changed.  Economics, political power, international influence.

In 2005, Uzbekistan threw out the U.S. Government and pretty much all NGOs (Non-Government Organization) such as the Red Cross. I wonder if they threw out Google?

Have you noticed that the “War on Terror” is not a war on any geographically definable nation?  It’s more like war on a way of doing things.  Nations don’t go to war these days.  It seems everybody is at war with “radical Islam”.  Well, that’s not a nation.  You can’t bomb it. You can’t sanction it. You can’t blockade it.  I predict future wars will not occur between physically isolated sovereign nations.  Instead, a transnational organization such as Google, will engage and we will not call it war.  The United States has “National Interests” they will work to preserve with Economic, Political, Diplomatic, and Military power.  Google has “Business Interests” they will work to preserve with Economic, Political, and Diplomatic power.  It gets even more interesting when a corporation such as Google has idealogical commitments to moral issuesGoogle in the Garden of Good and Evil.

Posted in General | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Robert Kennedy GNP Speech at University of Kansas

Robert F. Kennedy, at the University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, March 18, 1968:

Too much and too long, we seem to have surrendered community excellence and community values in the mere accumulation of material things. Our gross national product … if we should judge America by that – counts air pollution and cigarette advertising, and ambulances to clear our highways of carnage. It counts special locks for our doors and the jails for those who break them. It counts the destruction of our redwoods and the loss of our natural wonder in chaotic sprawl. It counts napalm and the cost of a nuclear warhead, and armored cars for police who fight riots in our streets. It counts Whitman’s rifle and Speck’s knife, and the television programs which glorify violence in order to sell toys to our children.

Yet the gross national product does not allow for the health of our children, the quality of their education, or the joy of their play. It does not include the beauty of our poetry or the strength of our marriages; the intelligence of our public debate or the integrity of our public officials. It measures neither our wit nor our courage; neither our wisdom nor our learning; neither our compassion nor our devotion to our country; it measures everything, in short, except that which makes life worthwhile. And it tells us everything about America except why we are proud that we are Americans.

I think this speech was a motivation to include more Democratic programs funded by tax dollars.  In the generic, I don’t value that move.  However, I’ve spent a lot of time recently studying how America interacts with the world in a National Security context.  We promote Democracy.  It seems we grade the success of any nation too much by how it is economically performing.  In this context, I really agree with Mr. Kennedy’s desire to consider other things.

Posted in Finance, Spirit & Heart | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Pressure to Live in the Norm

I recently read a book that critiques “big corporatocracies destroying the little people”.  However, I’m left wondering if “big government to control them” is any better.

Mortgage defaults these days are horendous.  Everybody over-bought what they should have. But defaulting wrecks your credit rating, keeping many people in their homes, lowering their standard of living while honoring the debt they incurred.  USA Today newspaper released an article today titled “Mortgage defaulters may not be bad risks,” based on a TransUnion study (or local copy), which basically provided an excuse for defaulting on !only! your home loan. If you pay off others, then you won’t be hurt that bad credit-wise.

That seems unfair to those who do responsibly accept the burden of paying off a loan more than their house value. But times change.  As the bulk of people grapple with an issue, mores of society shift to accommodate it. 

Conclusion: live like everybody else.  Don’t have stringent reasons for being outliers of the gaussian distribution. Are you too “liberal”, wanting to overthrow a government?  You’ll be taken down as a terrorist.  Are you too “conservative” and standing on timeless values? You’ll be taken down as a fundamentalist nut.

Our society doesn’t handle large dynamic range very well.  The rules change and adapt to the norm.

Posted in Spirit & Heart | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Screwed: The Undeclared War Against the Middle Class

I read Thom Hartmann’s book “Screwed:  Undeclared War Against the Middle Class”.  You can view other reviews by New Your Magazine and an opinion piece by the author on AlterNet.

Here are the memorable points I came away with:

  • There can be a democracy if-and-only-if a middle class is assured ‘living wage’ resulting in job security, a house, health insurance.
  • The elite and rich actively subdue the would-be middle class
  • Corporations are the Thom Hartmann boogie man. They take advantage of the middle class and strive to take over a would-be democratic government.
  • America was founded by the middle class, and all us middle class must rise up and take back our government.
  • All the hurt people don’t make a “living wage”.  They’re barely able to survive and pay the bills. That presumes obligations are required of everyone; I sensed no recognition that the bills to pay are largely wrought by the individual.  I would argue only lightly against his claim “The 80-hr workweek is now the norm”.  However, he doesn’t finish the sentence: “The 80-hr work week is now the norm … to satisfy all the desires we have been trained to want.”
  • Unions are good because they are a democratic institution.  Compare this with the Federal legal case just brought against Boeing because they’re building their next assembly plant in Louisiana that allows unions, instead of Washington state that *requires* employees to be union.
  • Pooling risk to buy insurance is accepted by society (private corporations’ profit), so it’s disingenuous for corporations to argue against pooling risk and have the government pay for it.

Below are some more thoughts from the book – Continue reading

Posted in Finance | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments